<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (8) TMI 17 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15213</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the assessment orders concerning the determination of the fair market value of the land and directing a reassessment based on the agreed sale price with Konarka Builders. The petitions were dismissed in other respects, including the challenge to the penalty orders under section 18(1)(c). The court vacated the interim orders, and each party was directed to bear its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:16:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (8) TMI 17 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15213</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the assessment orders concerning the determination of the fair market value of the land and directing a reassessment based on the agreed sale price with Konarka Builders. The petitions were dismissed in other respects, including the challenge to the penalty orders under section 18(1)(c). The court vacated the interim orders, and each party was directed to bear its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>