https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370367 The court directed that upon the petitioners providing security of equal value as per Section 129(1)(a) of U.P. GST, the goods and the vehicle would be released immediately. The court acknowledged the need for further consideration of the case, allowing both parties to submit affidavits for detailed examination before reaching a decision. The applicability of a circular from 2017 in light of a subsequent rule amendment in 2018 was a key point of contention in the case regarding the seizure of goods due to a lack of proper E-way bill. en-us Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Feb 2025 14:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370367 The court directed that upon the petitioners providing security of equal value as per Section 129(1)(a) of U.P. GST, the goods and the vehicle would be released immediately. The court acknowledged the need for further consideration of the case, allowing both parties to submit affidavits for detailed examination before reaching a decision. The applicability of a circular from 2017 in light of a subsequent rule amendment in 2018 was a key point of contention in the case regarding the seizure of goods due to a lack of proper E-way bill. Case-Laws GST Wed, 14 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370367