<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 707 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370364</link>
    <description>In a prosecution under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the bail application was not finally decided because custodial interrogation was stated to be required. The HC kept the application pending and fixed it for later consideration, leaving the question of bail open for a subsequent hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 707 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370364</link>
      <description>In a prosecution under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the bail application was not finally decided because custodial interrogation was stated to be required. The HC kept the application pending and fixed it for later consideration, leaving the question of bail open for a subsequent hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>