<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (10) TMI 20 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15211</link>
    <description>The court rejected most questions raised by the assessee for assessment years 1984-85 and 1985-86, except for the excise duty deduction issues in each year. The court directed the Tribunal to refer only the excise duty deduction questions for further consideration, while dismissing other questions as lacking substance. The assessee was ordered to pay costs to the Revenue for pursuing non-referable questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:02:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54211" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (10) TMI 20 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15211</link>
      <description>The court rejected most questions raised by the assessee for assessment years 1984-85 and 1985-86, except for the excise duty deduction issues in each year. The court directed the Tribunal to refer only the excise duty deduction questions for further consideration, while dismissing other questions as lacking substance. The assessee was ordered to pay costs to the Revenue for pursuing non-referable questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>