<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 686 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370343</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to grant the refund to the exporter based on clerical errors in shipping bills, the application of CBEC Circular No. 18/2008-Cus treating FOB price as cum duty price, and without the need for reassessment. Previous judgments were distinguished due to the specific circumstances of the case, leading to the rejection of Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 686 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370343</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to grant the refund to the exporter based on clerical errors in shipping bills, the application of CBEC Circular No. 18/2008-Cus treating FOB price as cum duty price, and without the need for reassessment. Previous judgments were distinguished due to the specific circumstances of the case, leading to the rejection of Revenue&#039;s appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>