<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 682 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370339</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for differential duty based on the transaction value at the railway siding and rejected the appeals on both the duty calculation and Education Cess issues. The legal analysis focused on interpreting relevant provisions of the Central Excise Act and the Customs Act to determine the appropriate valuation for duty calculation in the context of goods clearance by a 100% EOU to DTA.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2018 11:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 682 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370339</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand for differential duty based on the transaction value at the railway siding and rejected the appeals on both the duty calculation and Education Cess issues. The legal analysis focused on interpreting relevant provisions of the Central Excise Act and the Customs Act to determine the appropriate valuation for duty calculation in the context of goods clearance by a 100% EOU to DTA.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370339</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>