<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 678 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370335</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned in the Special Leave Petition, and the Court noted that the petitioner had removed the defects within one week. On that basis, the petitioner was left at liberty to approach the High Court, and any application filed within two weeks was to be considered on its own merits. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed, and pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 07:58:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542078" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 678 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370335</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned in the Special Leave Petition, and the Court noted that the petitioner had removed the defects within one week. On that basis, the petitioner was left at liberty to approach the High Court, and any application filed within two weeks was to be considered on its own merits. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed, and pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>