<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 676 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370333</link>
    <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order, remanding the matter to the original adjudicating authority for revising the duty demand after excluding the amount already paid. The penalty under Section 77(1) was reduced, while penalties under other sections were either upheld or subject to revision based on the actual shortfall. The appeal was partly allowed, providing relief to M/s Genom Biotech Pvt. Ltd. in the specified terms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 07:57:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 676 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370333</link>
      <description>The tribunal set aside the impugned order, remanding the matter to the original adjudicating authority for revising the duty demand after excluding the amount already paid. The penalty under Section 77(1) was reduced, while penalties under other sections were either upheld or subject to revision based on the actual shortfall. The appeal was partly allowed, providing relief to M/s Genom Biotech Pvt. Ltd. in the specified terms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>