<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 673 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370330</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order, and held that Cenvat Credit is admissible on service tax paid for outward transportation of the final product directly to the customer. The Tribunal determined that transportation from the place of removal qualifies as an input service, in line with a Supreme Court judgment and previous Tribunal ruling, thus resolving the dispute in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 18:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=542072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 673 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370330</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order, and held that Cenvat Credit is admissible on service tax paid for outward transportation of the final product directly to the customer. The Tribunal determined that transportation from the place of removal qualifies as an input service, in line with a Supreme Court judgment and previous Tribunal ruling, thus resolving the dispute in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>