https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370325 The appeal was allowed by way of remand as the Tribunal noted non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 but acknowledged the partial deposit made by the appellant. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision on merit without insisting on further pre-deposit, keeping all issues open. The judgment underscores the importance of procedural compliance and the Tribunal's authority to remand cases for a fair consideration on merits, ensuring adherence to legal procedures and principles of natural justice. en-us Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Nov 2018 07:57:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370325 The appeal was allowed by way of remand as the Tribunal noted non-compliance with Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944 but acknowledged the partial deposit made by the appellant. The matter was remanded to the Commissioner (Appeals) for a fresh decision on merit without insisting on further pre-deposit, keeping all issues open. The judgment underscores the importance of procedural compliance and the Tribunal's authority to remand cases for a fair consideration on merits, ensuring adherence to legal procedures and principles of natural justice. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 24 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370325