<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 52 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15201</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, ruling in favor of the assessee on both issues. As long as the order recognizing the partial partition remained valid, only 50% of the share income from the firm should be assessed in the hands of the Hindu undivided family. The court emphasized the importance of respecting legally recognized partitions in determining tax liability for such families.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:36:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54201" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 52 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15201</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Appellate Tribunal, ruling in favor of the assessee on both issues. As long as the order recognizing the partial partition remained valid, only 50% of the share income from the firm should be assessed in the hands of the Hindu undivided family. The court emphasized the importance of respecting legally recognized partitions in determining tax liability for such families.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15201</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>