https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276667 The High Court's order upholding demolition was set aside because the parties had not been given a fair opportunity to meet the plans and materials relied upon by the authority. As the dispute concerned the fairness of the process adopted in relation to demolition of structures, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after both sides were allowed to file affidavits and documents. The merits of the rival claims and the legality of the demolition action were not examined, and no view was expressed on those issues. The writ petition was restored for disposal on merits after hearing all parties. en-us Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Nov 2018 15:23:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276667 The High Court's order upholding demolition was set aside because the parties had not been given a fair opportunity to meet the plans and materials relied upon by the authority. As the dispute concerned the fairness of the process adopted in relation to demolition of structures, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration after both sides were allowed to file affidavits and documents. The merits of the rival claims and the legality of the demolition action were not examined, and no view was expressed on those issues. The writ petition was restored for disposal on merits after hearing all parties. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276667