<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1955 (4) TMI 46 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276662</link>
    <description>Section 60A of the Indian Income-tax Act was construed as a limited power to remove hardship or anomaly arising from the Act&#039;s extension to Part B States and merged territories, and only in a manner favourable to the assessee. An amendment that operated to the assessee&#039;s disadvantage was held to exceed that power, so the attempted explanation to paragraph 2 of the Taxation Laws (Part B States) (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 1950 was invalid. The argument that the amendment could instead be supported under section 12 of the Finance Act was also rejected because that was a distinct power and the Government could not recast an order made under section 60A as one under section 12. The amendment was therefore void in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 13:14:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541996" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1955 (4) TMI 46 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276662</link>
      <description>Section 60A of the Indian Income-tax Act was construed as a limited power to remove hardship or anomaly arising from the Act&#039;s extension to Part B States and merged territories, and only in a manner favourable to the assessee. An amendment that operated to the assessee&#039;s disadvantage was held to exceed that power, so the attempted explanation to paragraph 2 of the Taxation Laws (Part B States) (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 1950 was invalid. The argument that the amendment could instead be supported under section 12 of the Finance Act was also rejected because that was a distinct power and the Government could not recast an order made under section 60A as one under section 12. The amendment was therefore void in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 1955 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276662</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>