https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276644 A mere change in the constitution of a business from partnership to sole proprietorship, where the undertaking continues in the same name, purpose and object, does not by itself amount to a transfer of undertaking or a change of employer under the Industrial Disputes Act. On that basis, continuous service is not broken and liability under Sections 25F and 25FF remains unaffected. The document also states that a discharge without notice, assessed on the surrounding facts including the employer's own plea that the worker had resigned, may still fall within retrenchment under Section 2(oo). en-us Fri, 15 May 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Nov 2018 10:19:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276644 A mere change in the constitution of a business from partnership to sole proprietorship, where the undertaking continues in the same name, purpose and object, does not by itself amount to a transfer of undertaking or a change of employer under the Industrial Disputes Act. On that basis, continuous service is not broken and liability under Sections 25F and 25FF remains unaffected. The document also states that a discharge without notice, assessed on the surrounding facts including the employer's own plea that the worker had resigned, may still fall within retrenchment under Section 2(oo). Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 15 May 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276644