<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 656 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370313</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the Special Leave Petition was condoned after the Court accepted the explanation for lateness, allowing the matter to proceed. The petition was then dismissed because the dispute involved only a low tax effect, and that consideration was treated as the determinative basis for disposal. The order records no further substantive reasoning beyond the grant of condonation and the low tax effect as the ground for dismissal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:27:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 656 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370313</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the Special Leave Petition was condoned after the Court accepted the explanation for lateness, allowing the matter to proceed. The petition was then dismissed because the dispute involved only a low tax effect, and that consideration was treated as the determinative basis for disposal. The order records no further substantive reasoning beyond the grant of condonation and the low tax effect as the ground for dismissal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>