<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 648 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370305</link>
    <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the taxation of freight paid to nonresident shipping companies. The court emphasized that a Larger Bench judgment had overruled a previous Division Bench judgment, clarifying the correct law on the matter. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with no order as to costs, as the other questions raised in the appeal were not pursued by the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:26:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 648 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370305</link>
      <description>The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision and ruling in favor of the assessee regarding the taxation of freight paid to nonresident shipping companies. The court emphasized that a Larger Bench judgment had overruled a previous Division Bench judgment, clarifying the correct law on the matter. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with no order as to costs, as the other questions raised in the appeal were not pursued by the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>