<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 643 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370300</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete additions based on a notional value exceeding actual rent received for income from house property. Emphasizing the principle of consistency, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, citing past judgments and previous favorable decisions for the assessee. The CIT (A) order was set aside, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed based on established principles of income tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:26:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541933" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 643 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370300</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to delete additions based on a notional value exceeding actual rent received for income from house property. Emphasizing the principle of consistency, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, citing past judgments and previous favorable decisions for the assessee. The CIT (A) order was set aside, and the appeal of the assessee was allowed based on established principles of income tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>