<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 617 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370274</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to the absence of evidence proving any malafide intention on the part of the appellant, a public sector undertaking. The decision was based on precedents indicating that it would be unreasonable to assume malafide intention for such entities, ultimately allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:24:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 617 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370274</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on the appellant under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, due to the absence of evidence proving any malafide intention on the part of the appellant, a public sector undertaking. The decision was based on precedents indicating that it would be unreasonable to assume malafide intention for such entities, ultimately allowing the appeal in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>