<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 612 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370269</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that without challenging the assessment of the refund claim, Revenue cannot issue a show cause notice under Section 11AC of the Act. In a case where no duty is payable and self-credit is taken, Section 11AC provisions do not apply. Additionally, denying cenvat credit based on a test report of inputs is unjustified. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2018 07:24:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541902" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 612 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370269</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that without challenging the assessment of the refund claim, Revenue cannot issue a show cause notice under Section 11AC of the Act. In a case where no duty is payable and self-credit is taken, Section 11AC provisions do not apply. Additionally, denying cenvat credit based on a test report of inputs is unjustified. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal with any consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>