<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 50 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15190</link>
    <description>Closing stock may be revalued at market price where the facts require, including on dissolution of a firm, and the resulting addition was sustained. For disallowance under section 40(b), only net interest, not gross interest, is to be taken into account, so the interest disallowance was confined accordingly. The reference was answered partly for the Revenue and partly for the assessee on these two points.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:55:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 50 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15190</link>
      <description>Closing stock may be revalued at market price where the facts require, including on dissolution of a firm, and the resulting addition was sustained. For disallowance under section 40(b), only net interest, not gross interest, is to be taken into account, so the interest disallowance was confined accordingly. The reference was answered partly for the Revenue and partly for the assessee on these two points.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>