https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276621 Section 146 CPC was held to extend to a transferee who acquired the mortgaged properties during pendency of the appeal, because a person claiming under a party may continue proceedings where the original party could have done so. The provision was construed liberally as a beneficent rule facilitating assertion of devolved rights, not narrowly on technical grounds. Since the purchaser had a direct and substantial interest in resisting execution and the dispute affected her rights in the properties, the application to be added as an additional appellant was maintainable. The refusal to implead was set aside and she was allowed to continue the appeal. en-us Fri, 14 Feb 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 May 2026 11:16:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276621 Section 146 CPC was held to extend to a transferee who acquired the mortgaged properties during pendency of the appeal, because a person claiming under a party may continue proceedings where the original party could have done so. The provision was construed liberally as a beneficent rule facilitating assertion of devolved rights, not narrowly on technical grounds. Since the purchaser had a direct and substantial interest in resisting execution and the dispute affected her rights in the properties, the application to be added as an additional appellant was maintainable. The refusal to implead was set aside and she was allowed to continue the appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 14 Feb 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276621