<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1946 (9) TMI 7 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276600</link>
    <description>Attachment of money lying with a municipality was held invalid where the procedure for attachment of a debt under Order 21 Rule 46 CPC was not followed. The court stated that a valid attachment requires a written prohibitory order, service on the debtor, and affixture of a copy on a conspicuous part of the court-house; mere issue of an attachment order is insufficient. Because the mandatory procedural steps were not complied with, the purported attachment could not stand and the order under challenge was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 15:21:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1946 (9) TMI 7 - PATNA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276600</link>
      <description>Attachment of money lying with a municipality was held invalid where the procedure for attachment of a debt under Order 21 Rule 46 CPC was not followed. The court stated that a valid attachment requires a written prohibitory order, service on the debtor, and affixture of a copy on a conspicuous part of the court-house; mere issue of an attachment order is insufficient. Because the mandatory procedural steps were not complied with, the purported attachment could not stand and the order under challenge was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>