<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1942 (2) TMI 21 - HIGH COURT OF SIND</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276598</link>
    <description>Attachment of debt is effective only when the prescribed procedural steps are strictly completed; service of a prohibitory order on the debtor or garnishee alone is insufficient. The attachment provision requires the full mode of proclamation, including affixation of a copy of the order on a conspicuous part of the court-house. Because that step was omitted, the attachment was incomplete even though another copy had been served and initial compliance was indicated. The court therefore treated attachment as a real act distinct from the mere making of an order and set aside the direction requiring the bank to deposit the in court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 1942 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 15:16:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1942 (2) TMI 21 - HIGH COURT OF SIND</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276598</link>
      <description>Attachment of debt is effective only when the prescribed procedural steps are strictly completed; service of a prohibitory order on the debtor or garnishee alone is insufficient. The attachment provision requires the full mode of proclamation, including affixation of a copy of the order on a conspicuous part of the court-house. Because that step was omitted, the attachment was incomplete even though another copy had been served and initial compliance was indicated. The court therefore treated attachment as a real act distinct from the mere making of an order and set aside the direction requiring the bank to deposit the in court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 1942 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276598</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>