<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1909 (8) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276592</link>
    <description>The court concluded that the principle invalidating gifts to non-sentient beings does not apply to bequests for religious purposes, and previous cases asserting the invalidity of such gifts were incorrectly decided. The matter was remanded to the Division Bench for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 1909 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 14:23:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1909 (8) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276592</link>
      <description>The court concluded that the principle invalidating gifts to non-sentient beings does not apply to bequests for religious purposes, and previous cases asserting the invalidity of such gifts were incorrectly decided. The matter was remanded to the Division Bench for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 1909 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276592</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>