<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (9) TMI 194 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276581</link>
    <description>Recruitment quota and seniority in a mixed cadre were determined with reference to substantive vacancies in the permanent establishment, not temporary posts created for probationers. Temporary posts outside the cadre could not be counted for quota adjustment, and confirmation as a full member depended on vacancy in the permanent cadre. Excess officiating promotions by promotees were irregular and did not displace the quota reserved for direct recruits. On that basis, direct recruits were entitled to the unfilled vacancies within their quota and ranked senior to the promotees; the High Court view in their favour was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:24:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541761" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (9) TMI 194 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276581</link>
      <description>Recruitment quota and seniority in a mixed cadre were determined with reference to substantive vacancies in the permanent establishment, not temporary posts created for probationers. Temporary posts outside the cadre could not be counted for quota adjustment, and confirmation as a full member depended on vacancy in the permanent cadre. Excess officiating promotions by promotees were irregular and did not displace the quota reserved for direct recruits. On that basis, direct recruits were entitled to the unfilled vacancies within their quota and ranked senior to the promotees; the High Court view in their favour was maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276581</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>