https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370263 The applicant's request for clarification on the admissibility of Excise duty, CVD, SAD, and VAT paid on Capital Goods for claiming credit under Section 140(2) of the CGST Act and Andhra Pradesh GST Act was denied. The authority ruled that transitional relief did not align with Input Tax Credit definitions, leading to the application being deemed beyond their jurisdiction under Section 98(2) of both Acts. The application was declared "not admitted" as it fell outside the relevant provisions' scope. en-us Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Mar 2025 17:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370263 The applicant's request for clarification on the admissibility of Excise duty, CVD, SAD, and VAT paid on Capital Goods for claiming credit under Section 140(2) of the CGST Act and Andhra Pradesh GST Act was denied. The authority ruled that transitional relief did not align with Input Tax Credit definitions, leading to the application being deemed beyond their jurisdiction under Section 98(2) of both Acts. The application was declared "not admitted" as it fell outside the relevant provisions' scope. Case-Laws GST Tue, 26 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370263