<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 582 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370239</link>
    <description>The court emphasized the duty of the applicants to cooperate with the authorities and directed the respondent to provide dates for the applicants to appear before the court in compliance with a court order. The judgment resolved a dispute over imported fuel classification by ordering retesting at a notified laboratory at the petitioners&#039; cost and instructed the department not to take coercive action pending investigation, provided the petitioners cooperate. The court also addressed the applicants&#039; request for protection against coercive action, emphasizing the need for cooperation with the ongoing investigation and issued directions for the provisional release of seized goods and cooperation with the investigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 07:13:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 582 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370239</link>
      <description>The court emphasized the duty of the applicants to cooperate with the authorities and directed the respondent to provide dates for the applicants to appear before the court in compliance with a court order. The judgment resolved a dispute over imported fuel classification by ordering retesting at a notified laboratory at the petitioners&#039; cost and instructed the department not to take coercive action pending investigation, provided the petitioners cooperate. The court also addressed the applicants&#039; request for protection against coercive action, emphasizing the need for cooperation with the ongoing investigation and issued directions for the provisional release of seized goods and cooperation with the investigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>