<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 573 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370230</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal against the order confirming service tax liability and penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of the service tax demand and interest but reduced the penalty imposed under Section 78 to 50% of the confirmed service tax amount. It emphasized the importance of complying with statutory provisions in determining penalties for non-payment of service tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 07:12:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 573 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370230</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal against the order confirming service tax liability and penalties under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Tribunal upheld the confirmation of the service tax demand and interest but reduced the penalty imposed under Section 78 to 50% of the confirmed service tax amount. It emphasized the importance of complying with statutory provisions in determining penalties for non-payment of service tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>