https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370228 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the services provided, including the transport of coal and handling within mining areas, should be classified under 'transportation of goods by road service' rather than as Cargo Handling Service or Mining Services. Citing a Supreme Court judgment and considering the definition of 'mines' under the Mines Act, the Tribunal concluded that the department's classification was incorrect. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and the order demanding service tax was set aside. en-us Thu, 20 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Nov 2018 07:12:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370228 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the services provided, including the transport of coal and handling within mining areas, should be classified under 'transportation of goods by road service' rather than as Cargo Handling Service or Mining Services. Citing a Supreme Court judgment and considering the definition of 'mines' under the Mines Act, the Tribunal concluded that the department's classification was incorrect. As a result, the appeal was allowed, and the order demanding service tax was set aside. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 20 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370228