<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 569 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370226</link>
    <description>The Court set aside the order refusing to entertain the appeal due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The petitioners were directed to deposit 10% of the claimed amount within four weeks to proceed with the appeal, allowing for the withdrawal of the bank guarantee upon compliance. The Court emphasized compliance with the directed deposit within six weeks, disposing of the petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 07:12:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 569 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370226</link>
      <description>The Court set aside the order refusing to entertain the appeal due to non-compliance with the pre-deposit requirement under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The petitioners were directed to deposit 10% of the claimed amount within four weeks to proceed with the appeal, allowing for the withdrawal of the bank guarantee upon compliance. The Court emphasized compliance with the directed deposit within six weeks, disposing of the petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>