<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 42 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15171</link>
    <description>Cash house rent allowance paid to a managing director is treated as remuneration when applying the statutory ceiling on allowable expenditure. For executives, cash house rent allowance and medical reimbursement, although not perquisites, form part of salary for computing the applicable disallowance ceiling. These cash payments must therefore be included in determining the limits under the Income-tax Act, rather than excluded on the basis that they are not perquisites.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:12:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 42 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15171</link>
      <description>Cash house rent allowance paid to a managing director is treated as remuneration when applying the statutory ceiling on allowable expenditure. For executives, cash house rent allowance and medical reimbursement, although not perquisites, form part of salary for computing the applicable disallowance ceiling. These cash payments must therefore be included in determining the limits under the Income-tax Act, rather than excluded on the basis that they are not perquisites.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>