https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276572 The revision application filed by the Deputy Commissioner of Customs was rejected as inadmissible. The case involved the smuggling of goods by Mr. Mukri, with the seizure occurring at a location not within the airport area, classified as a town seizure matter. The Government determined that the re-export of gold jewellery by Mr. Mukri was not permissible under Section 129DD and Section 129A of the Customs Act due to the nature of the offense. en-us Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Nov 2018 07:11:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276572 The revision application filed by the Deputy Commissioner of Customs was rejected as inadmissible. The case involved the smuggling of goods by Mr. Mukri, with the seizure occurring at a location not within the airport area, classified as a town seizure matter. The Government determined that the re-export of gold jewellery by Mr. Mukri was not permissible under Section 129DD and Section 129A of the Customs Act due to the nature of the offense. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276572