<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (4) TMI 41 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15170</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the amount set apart for the molasses storage reserve fund should be excluded from total income as revenue expenditure. The decision was based on a similar case precedent involving a co-operative society, where funds collected under statutory obligation for a specific purpose were not considered part of the assessee&#039;s income. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, and the tax cases were disposed of without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 15:10:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=54170" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (4) TMI 41 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15170</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the amount set apart for the molasses storage reserve fund should be excluded from total income as revenue expenditure. The decision was based on a similar case precedent involving a co-operative society, where funds collected under statutory obligation for a specific purpose were not considered part of the assessee&#039;s income. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was upheld, and the tax cases were disposed of without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=15170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>