https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276541 An allottee who accepted land on an as-is-where-is basis could not demand a free approach road where the lease deed required the lessee to develop its own infrastructure and did not impose an absolute obligation on the allotting authority. An amendment to Rule 11-A created only a limited deeming fiction for sub-lease purposes and did not transfer ownership or strip the original allotting authority of title or power to cancel the allotment. Where the contract provided performance terms, cancellation, review, appeal and arbitration remedies, a writ court should not be used to rewrite the bargain or bypass the agreed and statutory remedies. The cancellation was therefore restored. en-us Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Jul 2023 18:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276541 An allottee who accepted land on an as-is-where-is basis could not demand a free approach road where the lease deed required the lessee to develop its own infrastructure and did not impose an absolute obligation on the allotting authority. An amendment to Rule 11-A created only a limited deeming fiction for sub-lease purposes and did not transfer ownership or strip the original allotting authority of title or power to cancel the allotment. Where the contract provided performance terms, cancellation, review, appeal and arbitration remedies, a writ court should not be used to rewrite the bargain or bypass the agreed and statutory remedies. The cancellation was therefore restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 12 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276541