<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (10) TMI 108 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276536</link>
    <description>The court held that the value of depreciable assets in the balance-sheet should not be adjusted based on the written down value from income-tax records. It also allowed the estimated value of contingent liability for gratuity as a deduction in computing the net wealth of the assessee. Each party was directed to bear its own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 14:55:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541650" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (10) TMI 108 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276536</link>
      <description>The court held that the value of depreciable assets in the balance-sheet should not be adjusted based on the written down value from income-tax records. It also allowed the estimated value of contingent liability for gratuity as a deduction in computing the net wealth of the assessee. Each party was directed to bear its own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>