<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1238 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276523</link>
    <description>The High Court held that interest income from fixed deposits used as collateral for business loans in an export business should be treated as business income eligible for deduction under section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act. The court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, relying on precedents where similar interest income was considered business income, distinguishing a Supreme Court decision cited by the revenue as not applicable in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 12:00:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1238 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276523</link>
      <description>The High Court held that interest income from fixed deposits used as collateral for business loans in an export business should be treated as business income eligible for deduction under section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act. The court dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, relying on precedents where similar interest income was considered business income, distinguishing a Supreme Court decision cited by the revenue as not applicable in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>