<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1939 (6) TMI 11 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276516</link>
    <description>Certified copies of confidential income-tax assessment records are not admissible in evidence unless the person seeking them has a statutory right to inspect the originals. The Calcutta HC noted that assessment records were confidential under the Income-tax Act, intended to secure frank disclosure by assessees, and that a document&#039;s status as a public document does not give unrestricted access to it. Under the Evidence Act, a certified copy is admissible only where inspection of the original is legally available. On that basis, copies obtained from the department in proceedings between co-assessee partners were rightly rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 1939 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:38:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1939 (6) TMI 11 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276516</link>
      <description>Certified copies of confidential income-tax assessment records are not admissible in evidence unless the person seeking them has a statutory right to inspect the originals. The Calcutta HC noted that assessment records were confidential under the Income-tax Act, intended to secure frank disclosure by assessees, and that a document&#039;s status as a public document does not give unrestricted access to it. Under the Evidence Act, a certified copy is admissible only where inspection of the original is legally available. On that basis, copies obtained from the department in proceedings between co-assessee partners were rightly rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 1939 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276516</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>