<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 557 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370214</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging an attachment order based on excise dues and CGST payment demand, as the petitioner had previously acknowledged the liability and expressed willingness to pay in installments. The court noted that the petitioner had accepted the liability, making it unnecessary to challenge the demand at this stage, as the opportunity for a show cause notice had passed. Therefore, the court found no merit in the petition and dismissed it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2025 14:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541568" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 557 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370214</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition challenging an attachment order based on excise dues and CGST payment demand, as the petitioner had previously acknowledged the liability and expressed willingness to pay in installments. The court noted that the petitioner had accepted the liability, making it unnecessary to challenge the demand at this stage, as the opportunity for a show cause notice had passed. Therefore, the court found no merit in the petition and dismissed it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>