<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 555 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370212</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee. The addition of Rs. 1,86,30,000/- under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act was deleted as the assessee successfully proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions with BMPL. The Tribunal emphasized that the funds were transferred through legitimate banking channels, and the source of the credit was adequately explained. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on November 9, 2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 12:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541566" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 555 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370212</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling in favor of the assessee. The addition of Rs. 1,86,30,000/- under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act was deleted as the assessee successfully proved the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of transactions with BMPL. The Tribunal emphasized that the funds were transferred through legitimate banking channels, and the source of the credit was adequately explained. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision on November 9, 2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>