<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 547 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370204</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the decisions of the CIT (A) in both issues, dismissing the appeal of the assessing officer. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing proper documentation and justification for expenses claimed as business expenditures and rejected disallowances made on ad hoc or conjectural grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 08:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541558" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 547 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370204</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the decisions of the CIT (A) in both issues, dismissing the appeal of the assessing officer. The judgment emphasized the importance of providing proper documentation and justification for expenses claimed as business expenditures and rejected disallowances made on ad hoc or conjectural grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370204</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>