<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 545 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370202</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed grounds challenging the assessment order&#039;s validity, disallowance of late provident fund payment, and notional interest disallowance. It allowed the appeal on classifying store purchases as revenue expenditure. The issue of charging interest under various sections was not explicitly addressed but may require adjustment based on revised tax calculations. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 08:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 545 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370202</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed grounds challenging the assessment order&#039;s validity, disallowance of late provident fund payment, and notional interest disallowance. It allowed the appeal on classifying store purchases as revenue expenditure. The issue of charging interest under various sections was not explicitly addressed but may require adjustment based on revised tax calculations. The appeal was partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370202</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>