<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 541 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370198</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions on all grounds, allowing the benefit of telescoping for unexplained income and cash, and finding no evidence to support the additions for unexplained investment in gold jewelry, unaccounted outpatient receipts, and unaccounted professional receipts. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:48:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 541 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370198</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) decisions on all grounds, allowing the benefit of telescoping for unexplained income and cash, and finding no evidence to support the additions for unexplained investment in gold jewelry, unaccounted outpatient receipts, and unaccounted professional receipts. The Tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>