<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 536 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370193</link>
    <description>The court granted the writ petition directing the 3rd respondent to issue a &#039;No Objection Certificate&#039; for the petitioner to avail benefits under the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-20. The petitioner, a company amalgamated with SEPR Refractories India Ltd., sought amendment of shipping bills, which the respondents initially refused due to electronic processes. However, the court instructed the 3rd respondent to issue the NOC, allowing the petitioner to present it to the 4th respondent for consideration within three months. Additionally, the 4th respondent was ordered to promptly consider the petitioner&#039;s claim upon submission of the NOC.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:48:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541547" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 536 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370193</link>
      <description>The court granted the writ petition directing the 3rd respondent to issue a &#039;No Objection Certificate&#039; for the petitioner to avail benefits under the Foreign Trade Policy, 2015-20. The petitioner, a company amalgamated with SEPR Refractories India Ltd., sought amendment of shipping bills, which the respondents initially refused due to electronic processes. However, the court instructed the 3rd respondent to issue the NOC, allowing the petitioner to present it to the 4th respondent for consideration within three months. Additionally, the 4th respondent was ordered to promptly consider the petitioner&#039;s claim upon submission of the NOC.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>