<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 535 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370192</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the absolute confiscation of a gold bangle/kara due to insufficient evidence supporting the applicant&#039;s claim of religious significance. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred by not offering the redemption option as required by law. The government rectified this by allowing the applicant to redeem the gold kara by paying Customs duty, a fine, and a penalty within 30 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:48:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 535 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370192</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the absolute confiscation of a gold bangle/kara due to insufficient evidence supporting the applicant&#039;s claim of religious significance. The Commissioner (Appeals) erred by not offering the redemption option as required by law. The government rectified this by allowing the applicant to redeem the gold kara by paying Customs duty, a fine, and a penalty within 30 days.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>