<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 528 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370185</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that they were not liable for service tax for the period after 1st April 2008. The Tribunal noted that the appellant had paid the service tax along with interest before the issuance of the show cause notice or in close proximity to it for the period before 1st April 2008. As a result, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and waived all penalties, granting the appellant consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:47:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 528 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370185</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that they were not liable for service tax for the period after 1st April 2008. The Tribunal noted that the appellant had paid the service tax along with interest before the issuance of the show cause notice or in close proximity to it for the period before 1st April 2008. As a result, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned order, and waived all penalties, granting the appellant consequential benefits in accordance with the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>