<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (11) TMI 526 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370183</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the Original Authority, directing the consideration of only figures supported by documentary evidence and instructing not to demand the service tax deposited during the investigation again. The appellants were given four weeks to make submissions, and the Original Adjudicating authority was tasked to re-adjudicate the matter within three months.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:47:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (11) TMI 526 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370183</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the Original Authority, directing the consideration of only figures supported by documentary evidence and instructing not to demand the service tax deposited during the investigation again. The appellants were given four weeks to make submissions, and the Original Adjudicating authority was tasked to re-adjudicate the matter within three months.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>