https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370178 The Tribunal allowed all appeals filed by the manufacturer-appellant and individuals facing personal penalties, except the appeal filed by Revenue. The Revenue's appeal was rejected as they failed to rebut the findings of the Original Authority or demonstrate why a relevant case law was not applicable in the present case. The Tribunal found that the Revenue did not discharge the burden of proof for the demand of approximately 58 lakhs, as they failed to produce evidence of manufacture and duty liability. en-us Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:47:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370178 The Tribunal allowed all appeals filed by the manufacturer-appellant and individuals facing personal penalties, except the appeal filed by Revenue. The Revenue's appeal was rejected as they failed to rebut the findings of the Original Authority or demonstrate why a relevant case law was not applicable in the present case. The Tribunal found that the Revenue did not discharge the burden of proof for the demand of approximately 58 lakhs, as they failed to produce evidence of manufacture and duty liability. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=370178