<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (10) TMI 82 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276491</link>
    <description>Interest received on delayed payment of compensation for compulsory acquisition was held to be taxable as income because its true character, not its label, governed the assessment. The Court applied the principle that the receipt was a separate revenue item for being kept out of the proper compensation and was not part of the statutory capital compensation under the governing land acquisition scheme. The amount was therefore assessable in the assessee&#039;s hands. The apportionment question was not decided on the merits, as the Tribunal had not addressed it after treating the receipt as non-taxable; it was left open for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:46:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (10) TMI 82 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276491</link>
      <description>Interest received on delayed payment of compensation for compulsory acquisition was held to be taxable as income because its true character, not its label, governed the assessment. The Court applied the principle that the receipt was a separate revenue item for being kept out of the proper compensation and was not part of the statutory capital compensation under the governing land acquisition scheme. The amount was therefore assessable in the assessee&#039;s hands. The apportionment question was not decided on the merits, as the Tribunal had not addressed it after treating the receipt as non-taxable; it was left open for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>