https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276492 The appeal was dismissed due to the lack of infirmity in the order passed by the CIT(A) and the absence of contrary decisions or material to challenge the income estimation. The incorrect address furnished by the assessee resulted in an ex parte disposal of the appeal, and the discrepancy in income estimation by the Assessing Officer was not effectively challenged. Despite contentions regarding unfair income estimation, the appeal was ultimately dismissed for lack of supporting evidence or arguments. en-us Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:46:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276492 The appeal was dismissed due to the lack of infirmity in the order passed by the CIT(A) and the absence of contrary decisions or material to challenge the income estimation. The incorrect address furnished by the assessee resulted in an ex parte disposal of the appeal, and the discrepancy in income estimation by the Assessing Officer was not effectively challenged. Despite contentions regarding unfair income estimation, the appeal was ultimately dismissed for lack of supporting evidence or arguments. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 21 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276492