<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (9) TMI 1748 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276496</link>
    <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed, and the order of the CIT(A) was upheld, confirming the validity of the reopening under Section 147 and the addition of 12.5% of the bogus purchases to the appellant&#039;s income. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the AO&#039;s actions and concluded that the reassessment and the additions were justified based on the credible information and evidence of bogus transactions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2018 07:46:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=541524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (9) TMI 1748 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276496</link>
      <description>The appeal filed by the assessee was dismissed, and the order of the CIT(A) was upheld, confirming the validity of the reopening under Section 147 and the addition of 12.5% of the bogus purchases to the appellant&#039;s income. The Tribunal found no infirmity in the AO&#039;s actions and concluded that the reassessment and the additions were justified based on the credible information and evidence of bogus transactions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=276496</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>